BLOG -


Doing Business in Germany - Unions and Works Council in Germany - an overview

Almost every time foreign companies are advised in the context of their market entry in Germany, the questions are asked: What is the relationship between trade unions and works councils? What are the responsibilities of trade unions and works councils? Must collective agreements be adopted? How can the election of a works council be prevented? or: How can cooperation with a works council once elected be ensured that takes account of the interests of the company?

In his contribution, Dr Dietmar Müller-Boruttau explains the relevant legal framework and illustrates ways in which companies can avoid the influence of trade unions and take defensive measures against the formation of works councils. Furthermore, Dr Dietmar Müller-Boruttau explains how, after a works council has nonetheless been elected, a trusting cooperation can be established or how unpopular works councils can be removed from office.

1. General framework with regard to the responsibility and relation between trade union and works council

In Germany, trade unions are responsible in particular for negotiating salaries and other working conditions (e.g. holiday entitlement, notice periods, continued remuneration in the event of illness), while works councils are basically responsible for operational interaction and cooperation between management and employees within the plant. However, neither the trade union nor the works council are entitled to act as the management of the company.

The rights and obligations of the trade union are governed by the German Collective Bargaining Agreement Act (TVG), the rights and obligations of the works council by the German Works Constitution Act (BetrVG).

The German Works Constitution Act clearly states in several sections that the works council and the employer can conclude arrangements unless collective bargaining agreements do already exist (see Section 77 (3) BetrVG and Section 87 (1) introductory sentence BetrVG). The purpose of these provisions is to ensure that the works council and the employer do not conclude more favorable regulations at company level compared to any collective agreement in force, thus reducing the influence and importance of trade unions.

The German Works Constitution Act sets out certain areas of mandatory mutually works council participation. This ranges from participation in recruitment, transfers, participation in the introduction of IT systems, the definition of remuneration principles and shifts, breaks to participation in operational changes and dismissals. In companies with a workforce of more than 100 employees, an economic committee must also be set up. If it is not possible for the employer and the works council to mutually reach an agreement on co-determination matters, it is not the labor court that decides in principle, but a conciliation committee under works constitution law, the conciliation committee.

2. Trade union in the company

German law does not provide for a trade union for a single company/plant. Trade unions are organizations independent of employers and companies that negotiate collective agreements with either an employers' association or individual employers.

3. To avoid the formation of a "hard" works council

In fact, the legal requirements for setting up a works council are very low. For plants with five or more employees a works council may be elected. Yet a wide range of measures can be taken to prevent the election of a works council or the influence of trade unions in companies.

3.1 Reliable corporate governance and working conditions

The first way to prevent the election of a works council and the influence of trade unions is to prevent the employees from developing a desire for a works council. Many German companies, some with several thousand employees, are successfully doing so.

The prerequisite for this is to establish an open, strong and consistent company management and to make the working conditions at least correspond to or even surpass the customary conditions which usually are existent in that respective industry. In this respect, salaries/wages, holidays and social benefits not provided for in the collective agreement may be taken into consideration. Many companies virtually adopt the provisions of the collective agreements and apply them on a voluntary basis. Such approaches also improve or rather strengthen the attractiveness of employers.

With this practice and also the open-door policy, even large companies with several thousand employees are able to prevent the establishment of works councils.

3.2 Election of the works council when setting up the company

If there are indications that the trade union is initiating a works council election or that employees are positioning themselves accordingly, experience shows that it may be a good idea to self-initiate a works council election on the employer side, particularly in companies that are still in the process of being set up, with the result of having more employer-friendly works council members being elected (more white than blue-collar workers). With this more employer-friendly works council, it is then possible to quickly negotiate all the company agreements relevant to the company, so that all the important relevant regulations for the future are in place for now. The influence of aggressive or even ideologically acting workers can thus be excluded or at least reduced.

Very important: In this way the salaries of the employees can also be fixed with the works council in a so-called "company remuneration regulation", which also works against the influence of the trade union or the desire of employees to ask trade unions for support.

3.3 Preventing a works council election

Should employees initiate a works council election, there is a certain range of possible options for reaction:

  • Convincing the employees not to carry out the election - if necessary with an announcement that voluntary benefits will be withdrawn;
  • Dismissal of employees - however, these employees initiating a works council election and those being elected enjoy special protection against dismissal and terminations are usually ineffective, but often these employees leave the company voluntarily;
  • Earlier initiation of the works council election by the employer with employer-oriented candidates.

4. Cooperation with elected works council

If it is not possible to prevent the election of a works council, experience shows that a cooperative interaction with the works council can calm down its members, provided that the employer's obligations towards the works council are respected. Such cooperation includes early involvement of the works council in planning, open communication and information, etc.

If works councils misuse their rights, it is also possible to remove individual works council members from the works council or dissolve the entire works council. Of course such procedures present the highest level of escalation.

Naturally, employers are free to point out the uselessness of a works council, even if it is in place, and to try to make unpopular works council members or the entire works council submit their resignations.

Dr Dietmar Müller-Boruttau
(Lawyer, Licensed Specialist for Labour Law)

Please note: A similar version of this article appeared in the Labor Law Magazine, Vol. 1/2020 on page 11.

TAGS

Arbeitsrecht

Contact us

Dr Dietmar Müller-Boruttau T   +49 30 26471-319 E   Dietmar.Mueller-Boruttau@bblaw.com